Audit, Compliance and Risk Blog

Radon gas is released naturally by radioactive decay within rock formations, from where it can percolate to the surface and infiltrate basement and trenching, and then produce hazardous concentrations if trapped or spread throughout the structure by the ventilation system. Because of its radioactive origin, radon can pose health risks – it’s the leading cause of lung cancer in non-smokers. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) administers extensive information programs, which encourage in-building testing (especially in housing), and provides guidance for hazard reduction. EPA’s authority derives primarily from the Indoor Radon Abatement Act of 1988 (codified as Title III of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)). In addition, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) considers radon a type of ionizing radiation subject to worker protection requirements. The remainder of this note provides background to radon hazards and their management, referencing information from EPA, OSHA and other agencies and professional organizations. 

On September 27, 2024, California’s governor Gavin Newsom signed Senate Bill (SB) 219, amending greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reporting requirements for targeted organizations doing business in the state, enacted in 2023 (SB 253 (Wiener) (Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act) and SB 261 (Stern)) and initially scheduled to require compliance beginning January 1, 2025. (I wrote about them HERE) SB 219 revises and delays emissions reporting requirements. The revised requirements will still be administered by the California Air Resources Board (ARB), expanding its longstanding air quality and climate authority (GHG provisions center on the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 ((AB 32)). The remainder of this note discusses the revisions made by SB 219. 

In recent years, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has reviewed its overlapping responsibilities to regulate pesticides under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), and to protect endangered and threatened species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). In August, EPA completed its latest step in these efforts by issuing its “Herbicide Strategy to Reduce Exposure of Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Species and Designated Critical Habitats from the Use of Conventional Agricultural Herbicides” (Herbicide Strategy). The rest of this note summarizes the Herbicide Strategy, and provides context regarding EPA’s FIFRA and ESA authorities. 

In October, the US Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and other federal agencies reacted to hurricanes in the Southeast by re-highlighting existing guidance to support preparation for potential hurricanes, and to respond if one occurs. OSHA’s guidance is directed at employers, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) provide more generalized guidance, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) target families. The rest of this note summarizes this timely information, centering on OSHA’s offerings. 

The Clean Air Act (CAA) directs the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to define “hazardous air pollutants (HAPs)” that may pose acute health hazards, and to impose regulations to reduce those hazards. Controls include permits for “major sources” of HAPs based on “Maximum Achievable Control Technologies (MACT),” and lesser controls for non-major “area sources.” Effective September 10, 2024 EPA has reinstated a policy that an emission source that met major source criteria at the time an applicable MACT became effective is “once in, always in” – even if a source makes binding changes reducing its “potential to emit” below the applicable major source threshold, it still cannot formally requalify as a less-regulated area source. This policy was in force from 1995 until EPA reversed it in January 2018 to allow full reclassification. EPA subsequently codified this approach in a rule issued in 2020. However, EPA has now revised that rule to reinstate “once in, always in.” The rest of this note summarizes CAA requirements for HAP sources, and the latest change. 

As the 2024 Presidential election enters its final stages, both major parties have published their election platforms. The Democrats have published a total of 91 pages covering all their promises, and the Republicans have published 16 pages. In 2020, the Democrats also published 91 pages, while the Republicans instead adopted a resolution promising continuity with ongoing Trump administration priorities (I wrote about the 2020 pronouncements HERE ). The remainder of this note summarizes the environmental elements in both parties’ 2024 platforms. Both documents conform to the parties’ general priorities, with the Democrats emphasizing continuing and expanding environmental policies of the most recent years while the Republicans promise to reduce regulatory burdens in line with returning to the policies of their most recent administration.

Canada has just imposed restrictions against false or misleading statements made in marketing or other materials regarding the environmental impacts and benefits of goods and services -- “greenwashing.” These provisions were adopted as amendments to the Competition Act, enacted as part of the Government’s omnibus “Fall Economic Statement Implementation Act, 2023” (Bill C-59), which received royal Assent on June 20.  

In July, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued the fifth edition of its periodic Climate Change Indicators report, focusing on Indicators related to the human health and societal impacts of climate change. While this 96-page report provides broad policy discussions, it applies data which calibrate ongoing changes that organizations can use to support evaluations of the possible impacts of these changes on their ongoing activities and future prospects. The remainder of this note summarizes EPA’s latest indicators, and how they can be relevant to organizational planning and decision-making.

The 2016 amendments to the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) added procedures for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to evaluate risks presented by existing chemicals using the latest scientific information – including information developed after a chemical entered use in the US. Based on these reviews, EPA is to update its regulatory requirements, ranging from labeling-only through use restrictions up to and including bans from further distribution and use. (I summarized these review requirements HERE ).  Beginning in November 2019, EPA regularly announces new chemical reviews, and subsequently the results of these reviews. (I wrote about the first review announcement HERE ). On July 25, 2024 EPA published a formal proposal to review 5 additional chemicals for designation as High-Priority Substance subject to strict controls under TSCA. The rest of this note identifies these proposed chemicals.

In June, the US Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and other federal agencies reacted to flooding in Florida by re-highlighting existing guidance to support preparation for potential flooding this summer, and to respond when it occurs. OSHA’s guidance is directed at employers, while the National Weather Service (NWS) provides more generalized guidance and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) target families. The rest of this note summarizes this timely information, centering on OSHA’s offerings.