Traditionally, industrial facilities have used fossil fuels such as coal, oil, and natural gas as their main source of energy. Over the years, however, facilities have sought to replace some or all of their fossil fuel with less expensive and more efficient alternative fuels from secondary materials. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has regulated the combustion of such wastes under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Under RCRA, some of these secondary materials are classified as ''hazardous wastes,'' while others are referred to as ''non-hazardous secondary materials.'' Facilities that combust ''solid waste'' as defined by EPA under RCRA must be regulated by emission standards issued by EPA under section 129 of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
Audit, Compliance and Risk Blog
EPA Revises Standards for Identification of Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials
Posted by STP Editorial Team on Tue, Jun 18, 2013
Tags: Business & Legal, Health & Safety, EPA, RCRA, CAA
PSD Rules Rescinded In Part
Recent court decisions rescind portions of EPA Clean Air Act rules governing Prevention of Serious Deterioration (PSD) and renewable fuels. For example, in October 2010, EPA adopted rules allowing for significant impact levels (SILs) and significant monitoring concentrations (SMCs) for sources of PM-2.5. However, in January of this year the D.C. Circuit upheld most elements of the 2012 standards, but vacated and remanded provisions establishing and applying projections of cellulosic biofuel use. American Petroleum Institute v. EPA, ___ F.3d ___ (D.C. Cir. 2013).
Tags: Health & Safety, OSHA, Environmental risks, Environmental, EPA, ghg
Incineration Standards and Fire Fighting—What You Need to Know
Posted by Viola Funk on Thu, May 23, 2013
Ensure Your Facility Meets Final EPA New Source Performance Standards for CISWI Units
On February 7, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a final rule (78 FR 9112) amending the new source performance standards for commercial and industrial solid waste incineration units. This action sets forth the agency’s final decision on a number of issues for which it granted reconsideration of the final rule titled “Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources and Emissions Guidelines for Existing Sources: Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units” (CISWI rule) that was issued in March 2011. The final rule establishes effective dates for the standards and makes various technical corrections to clarify definitions, references, applicability, and compliance issues.
Tags: Business & Legal, Health & Safety, Training, EPA, Greenhouse Gas
A FIRE CODE PRIMER
Date: Wednesday, May 22, 2013
Time: 2:00 PM - 3:00 PM EDT
Free! All are welcome
Tags: Health & Safety, OSHA, Hazcom, STC, Webinar
Are you an employer concerned with California Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) compliance? Some recent developments at the state level may affect your operations. To learn whether you need to take action, read on!
Tags: Health & Safety, OSHA, California Legislation, Greenhouse Gas, ghg
Employment Law and ERISA: Medical Plan Terms - Clarity Trumps Equity
Posted by Jon Elliott on Wed, May 01, 2013
On April 16, 2013 the U.S. Supreme Court delivered another reminder that agreements must be drafted clearly and specifically if they are to deliver predictable outcomes – otherwise a court’s later efforts to sort through ambiguities may produce surprises. The case is U.S. Airways v. McCutchen. It arose under a medical benefits plan subject to the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA).
Tags: Corporate Governance, Business & Legal, Employer Best Practices, Health & Safety, Employee Rights, Insurance, Insurance Claims, ERISA
Within the U.S., the principal hazardous waste management law is the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 (formally codified as Subtitle C of the Solid Waste Disposal Act (SWDA)). The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sets national standards and directly administers RCRA in some states, while state environmental protection agencies administer RCRA and their state acts when authorized by EPA to do so. For domestic activities – including shipments of hazardous waste from a generator to a recycler or treatment, storage and disposal (TSD) facility, that’s enough to know to start compliance.
But if your U.S. organization imports or exports hazardous wastes, you need to know that RCRA incorporates requirements driven by US participation in international treaty - and membership-based organizations. Alternatively, if you’re a non-U.S. reader you may recognize the following elements in your own national requirements.
Exports Consistent with the OECD Agreement
The most relevant international agreement is from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) – its 1992 “Decision C(92)39/FINAL Concerning the Control of Transfrontier Movements of Wastes Destined for Recovery Operations (OECD Decision)”, as amended. EPA’s RCRA regulations include specific provisions governing “Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Waste for Recovery Within the OECD.” (40 CFR §§ 262.80 – 262.89). As an exception to this coverage, separate rules provide similar requirements for exports to Canada and Mexico (under North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), even though they're also OECD members) (40 CFR §§ 262.80 – 262.89). EPA revises these rules from time to time (most recently in 2010).
The following requirements apply to exports to Canada or Mexico (and to non-OECD countries covered by separate treaties with the U.S.):
(1) The “primary exporter” (typically the generator) provides EPA with a written notification of intent to export, at least 60 days prior to the first shipment. This notification must be in writing, signed by the primary exporter, and include the following information:
-
Name, mailing address, telephone number and EPA ID number of the primary exporter
-
The following information, by consignee, for each hazardous waste type:
- Description of the hazardous waste and the EPA hazardous waste number, U.S. DOT proper shipping name, hazard class and ID number for each hazardous waste
- The estimated frequency or rate at which such waste is to be exported and the period of time over which such waste is to be exported
- The estimated total quantity of the hazardous waste (consistent with Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest)
- All points of entry to and departure from each foreign country through which the hazardous waste will pass
- Description of mode of transportation (air, highway, rail, water, etc.), and type(s) of container (drums, boxes, tanks, etc.)
- Description of how the hazardous waste will be treated, stored or disposed of in the receiving country (e.g., incineration, land disposal, recycling)
- Name and site address of the consignee and any alternate consignee
- Name of any transit countries through which the hazardous waste will be sent, description of the approximate time it will remain in such country, and the nature of its handling while there.
(2) The receiving country consents to accept the waste.
(3) A copy of an “EPA Acknowledgement of Consent” accompanies the shipment and, unless export takes place by rail, is attached to the manifest.
(4) The shipment conforms to the terms of the receiving country’s written consent.
(5) The shipment complies with RCRA manifest requirements (including the field for international shipments), modified to provide the address of the receiving consignee and alternate instead of facility, and to add the following to the certification of the shipment “and conforms to the terms of the attached EPA Acknowledgment of Consent.”
The primary exporter must notify EPA if the alternate consignee is used. If other problems arise, the primary exporter files an exception report with EPA; this follows requirements for domestic shipments, except that reports are filed with EPA Headquarters. Exporters must file an annual report with EPA summarizing the types, quantities, and destinations of all hazardous waste exported. Records must be retained for at least three years.
Exports to another OECD country instead must meet similar RCRA regulations designed to ensure consistency with OECD requirements. These include incorporation of OECD’s distinction between “Green Wastes” (wastes that present low risk for human health and the environment and, therefore, are not subject to any other controls than those normally applied in commercial transactions) and “Amber Wastes” (wastes presenting sufficient risk to justify their control). These RCRA regulations regulate as hazardous each waste that is a RCRA hazardous waste and/or an Amber waste not otherwise regulated as hazardous, and regulate Green Wastes as non-hazardous. These rules include notifications to EPA and consent by the receiving country similar to those described above, use of a “movement document” analogous to RCRA’s Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest, and requirements for a contract for transportation and management of the wastes. Exported wastes are to be managed in compliance with the receiving country’s requirements for these activities.
Basel Convention Considerations
In addition to OECD’s provisions, 172 nations and the European Union have ratified the 1989 Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal (Basel Convention). OECD revised its Decision in 2001 to align with Basel Convention provisions. President George Bush signed the agreement on behalf of the U.S. in 1989, but the Senate has never ratified it. Absent ratification, the United States cannot participate in waste transfers with Basel Parties without a separate and equivalent bilateral or multilateral agreement. The OECD agreement and NAFTA treaties constitutes such multilateral agreements, and the U.S. also has bilateral agreements with Costa Rica, Malaysia and the Philippines.
Imports of Hazardous Waste
Importers of hazardous wastes must complete manifests for the wastes, substituting their name and facility identifications for the non-domestic generator’s. The importer must provide the transporter with an additional copy to submit to EPA in compliance with the transporter’s manifest requirements. If the import is from an OECD country, the importer must also ensure that the shipment meets OECD requirements.
Implementation Checklist
If your organization is involved in imports and/or exports involving U.S. territory, consider the following checklist. If it is involved in imports or exports involving other OECD countries, the same general issues apply.
Does my organization intend to export hazardous waste, acting as the “primary exporter"?
- If so, is the shipment being sent to:
- Canada or Mexico?
- Another OECD country?
- A non-OECD country?
- Has my organization secured formal consent from the receiving country?
- Has my organization notified EPA of its intent to export?
- Has my organization received EPA’s acknowledgement of the receiving country’s consent?
- Does each shipment comply with domestic U.S. manifest requirements, and applicable requirements of the receiving country?
- Does the organization retain all required records?
- Does my organization intend to import hazardous waste?
- If so, is the shipment being sent from:
- Canada or Mexico?
- Another OECD country?
- A non-OECD country?
- Does each shipment comply with domestic U.S. manifest requirements?
- Does the organization retain all required records?
Where can I go for more information?
-
EPA Hazardous Waste Import/Export webpage www.epa.gov/compliance/monitoring/programs/rcra/importexport.html
-
OECD webpage on transboundary movements of hazardous wastes www.oecd.org/env/waste/theoecdcontrolsystemforwasterecovery.htm
-
Basel Convention www.basel.int
Tags: International, Health & Safety, Environmental risks, Environmental, EPA, Hazcom
Violence Against Women Act: Expanded Security Requirements On Campus
Posted by Jon Elliott on Tue, Mar 26, 2013
Earlier this month, President Obama signed the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2013, which renews and revises a wide variety of federal regulatory and grant programs intended to reduce gender-related violence against women. Although many of these protective measures are workplace-related, the amendments also expand protections for students at 99% of the nation’s colleges and universities (those that receive “Title IV” money from the U.S. Department of Education). These schools must comply with the Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act (Clery Act) by providing an Annual Security Report each October 1.
Tags: Employer Best Practices, Health & Safety, Workplace violence
Hospital Training Requirements: OSHA Training Regulations Revised
Posted by Viola Funk on Fri, Feb 01, 2013
If you’re responsible for hospital training requirements, and/or have responsibility for planning and carrying out a training program for your staff, you should know that OSHA regulations—such as the Hazard Communication Standard (HCS)—have been revised to conform to the UN’s Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals.
Tags: Corporate Governance, Employer Best Practices, Health & Safety, OSHA, Training, EHS, Hazcom
Employment Law: Is Your Workplace Injury and Illness Log Ready?
Posted by Jon Elliott on Wed, Jan 23, 2013
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requires employers to prepare and maintain records of occupational injuries and illnesses (I&I Logs) as they occur. OSHA also requires employers to post an annual I&I Summary in each “establishment” within their workplace by February 1, summarizing that workplace’s I&Is during the previous calendar year. In states that administer federal standards within state-run programs, employers follow the comparable state requirements. Because of this posting requirement, January is the time to confirm that your facility has maintained an adequate I&I Log during the year, and to prepare your summary for each workplace.
Tags: Corporate Governance, Business & Legal, Employer Best Practices, Health & Safety, Workplace violence