Audit, Compliance and Risk Blog

Cal/OSHA Revises Its Hazard Communication Standard

Posted by STP Editorial Team on Mon, Jul 15, 2013

Cal/OSHA’s Hazard Communication Standard (HCS) is designed to ensure that employers evaluate and classify the hazards of workplace chemicals, and that both employers and employees receive relevant information about those hazards. HCS requires all employers with hazardous chemicals in the workplace to develop, implement, and maintain a workplace hazard communication program to inform employees about the hazardous chemicals to which they may be exposed. HCS also requires manufacturers and importers of hazardous chemicals to classify the hazards of the chemicals that they produce or import, and distributors to pass this information to end-users.

Read More

Tags: Business & Legal, Health & Safety, OSHA, California Legislation, Hazcom

Environmental Compliance: TRI Reports Due

Posted by Jon Elliott on Fri, Jul 05, 2013

July 1 was the deadline for subject facilities to file their annual toxic chemical release inventory (TRI) reports with the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and their state, on one of two EPA-mandated forms, Form R or Form A.  These TRI reports are mandated by Section 313 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986 (EPCRA), which was adopted as the first Congressional response to the December 1984 toxic gas disaster in Bhopal, India.

Read More

Tags: Corporate Governance, Business & Legal, Health & Safety, Environmental risks, Environmental, EHS, Hazcom

Environmental Compliance: Changes to California Training Requirements

Posted by Viola Funk on Wed, Jul 03, 2013

California Revises Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator Certification Rules

The latest State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) regulatory tweaks broaden coverage but also give wastewater treatment plant owners some welcome wiggle room. Effective April 1, 2013, the SWRCB has revised its regulations regarding wastewater treatment plant classification, operator certification, and contractor registration. The rules have been expanded to cover privately owned wastewater treatment plants. However, they also establish a provisional operator certification. This means owners of Class I wastewater treatment plants who are finding it hard to recruit certified operators may employ provisional operators while conducting their search. In addition, the definition of wastewater treatment plant has been revised to clearly state that water recycling treatment plants are included within the definition. Numerous other key changes affecting California CCR compliance have been made to these regulations.

Read More

Tags: Corporate Governance, Employer Best Practices, Health & Safety, California Legislation, Training, Environmental risks, Environmental

EPA Revises Standards for Identification of Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials

Posted by STP Editorial Team on Tue, Jun 18, 2013

Traditionally, industrial facilities have used fossil fuels such as coal, oil, and natural gas as their main source of energy. Over the years, however, facilities have sought to replace some or all of their fossil fuel with less expensive and more efficient alternative fuels from secondary materials. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has regulated the combustion of such wastes under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Under RCRA, some of these secondary materials are classified as ''hazardous wastes,'' while others are referred to as ''non-hazardous secondary materials.'' Facilities that combust ''solid waste'' as defined by EPA under RCRA must be regulated by emission standards issued by EPA under section 129 of the Clean Air Act (CAA).

Read More

Tags: Business & Legal, Health & Safety, EPA, RCRA, CAA

Environmental Law: US Updates

Posted by Viola Funk on Tue, Jun 11, 2013

PSD Rules Rescinded In Part

Recent court decisions rescind portions of EPA Clean Air Act rules governing Prevention of Serious Deterioration (PSD) and renewable fuels. For example, in October 2010, EPA adopted rules allowing for significant impact levels (SILs) and significant monitoring concentrations (SMCs) for sources of PM-2.5. However, in January of this year the D.C. Circuit upheld most elements of the 2012 standards, but vacated and remanded provisions establishing and applying projections of cellulosic biofuel use. American Petroleum Institute v. EPA, ___ F.3d ___ (D.C. Cir. 2013).

Read More

Tags: Health & Safety, OSHA, Environmental risks, Environmental, EPA, ghg

Incineration Standards and Fire Fighting—What You Need to Know

Posted by Viola Funk on Thu, May 23, 2013

 

Ensure Your Facility Meets Final EPA New Source Performance Standards for CISWI Units

On February 7, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a final rule (78 FR 9112) amending the new source performance standards for commercial and industrial solid waste incineration units. This action sets forth the agency’s final decision on a number of issues for which it granted reconsideration of the final rule titled “Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources and Emissions Guidelines for Existing Sources: Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units” (CISWI rule) that was issued in March 2011. The final rule establishes effective dates for the standards and makes various technical corrections to clarify definitions, references, applicability, and compliance issues.

Read More

Tags: Business & Legal, Health & Safety, Training, EPA, Greenhouse Gas

STC Webinar: A Fire Code Primer

Posted by Melanie Powers on Tue, May 14, 2013

A FIRE CODE PRIMER

Date: Wednesday, May 22, 2013
Time: 2:00 PM - 3:00 PM EDT
Free! All are welcome

Read More

Tags: Health & Safety, OSHA, Hazcom, STC, Webinar

Changes to California Training Requirements

Posted by Viola Funk on Thu, May 09, 2013

Are you an employer concerned with California Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) compliance? Some recent developments at the state level may affect your operations. To learn whether you need to take action, read on!

Read More

Tags: Health & Safety, OSHA, California Legislation, Greenhouse Gas, ghg

Employment Law and ERISA: Medical Plan Terms - Clarity Trumps Equity

Posted by Jon Elliott on Wed, May 01, 2013

On April 16, 2013 the U.S. Supreme Court delivered another reminder that agreements must be drafted clearly and specifically if they are to deliver predictable outcomes – otherwise a court’s later efforts to sort through ambiguities may produce surprises. The case is U.S. Airways v. McCutchen. It arose under a medical benefits plan subject to the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA).

Read More

Tags: Corporate Governance, Business & Legal, Employer Best Practices, Health & Safety, Employee Rights, Insurance, Insurance Claims, ERISA

Hazardous Waste Regulations for International Shipments

Posted by Jon Elliott on Wed, Apr 03, 2013

Within the U.S., the principal hazardous waste management law is the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 (formally codified as Subtitle C of the Solid Waste Disposal Act (SWDA)). The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sets national standards and directly administers RCRA in some states, while state environmental protection agencies administer RCRA and their state acts when authorized by EPA to do so. For domestic activities – including shipments of hazardous waste from a generator to a recycler or treatment, storage and disposal (TSD) facility, that’s enough to know to start compliance.

But if your U.S. organization imports or exports hazardous wastes, you need to know that RCRA incorporates requirements driven by US participation in international treaty  - and membership-based organizations. Alternatively, if you’re a non-U.S. reader you may recognize the following elements in your own national requirements.

Exports Consistent with the OECD Agreement

The most relevant international agreement is from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) – its 1992 “Decision C(92)39/FINAL Concerning the Control of Transfrontier Movements of Wastes Destined for Recovery Operations (OECD Decision)”, as amended. EPA’s RCRA regulations include specific provisions governing “Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Waste for Recovery Within the OECD.” (40 CFR §§ 262.80 – 262.89). As an exception to this coverage, separate rules provide similar requirements for exports to Canada and Mexico (under North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), even though they're also OECD members) (40 CFR §§ 262.80 – 262.89). EPA revises these rules from time to time (most recently in 2010).

The following requirements apply to exports to Canada or Mexico (and to non-OECD countries covered by separate treaties with the U.S.):

(1) The “primary exporter” (typically the generator) provides EPA with a written notification of intent to export, at least 60 days prior to the first shipment. This notification must be in writing, signed by the primary exporter, and include the following information:

  • Name, mailing address, telephone number and EPA ID number of the primary exporter

  • The following information, by consignee, for each hazardous waste type:

    • Description of the hazardous waste and the EPA hazardous waste number, U.S. DOT proper shipping name, hazard class and ID number for each hazardous waste
    • The estimated frequency or rate at which such waste is to be exported and the period of time over which such waste is to be exported
    • The estimated total quantity of the hazardous waste (consistent with Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest)
    • All points of entry to and departure from each foreign country through which the hazardous waste will pass
    • Description of mode of transportation (air, highway, rail, water, etc.), and type(s) of container (drums, boxes, tanks, etc.)
    • Description of how the hazardous waste will be treated, stored or disposed of in the receiving country (e.g., incineration, land disposal, recycling)
    • Name and site address of the consignee and any alternate consignee
    • Name of any transit countries through which the hazardous waste will be sent, description of the approximate time it will remain in such country, and the nature of its handling while there.

(2) The receiving country consents to accept the waste.

(3) A copy of an “EPA Acknowledgement of Consent” accompanies the shipment and, unless export takes place by rail, is attached to the manifest.

(4) The shipment conforms to the terms of the receiving country’s written consent.

(5) The shipment complies with RCRA manifest requirements (including the field for international shipments), modified to provide the address of the receiving consignee and alternate instead of facility, and to add the following to the certification of the shipment “and conforms to the terms of the attached EPA Acknowledgment of Consent.”

The primary exporter must notify EPA if the alternate consignee is used. If other problems arise, the primary exporter files an exception report with EPA; this follows requirements for domestic shipments, except that reports are filed with EPA Headquarters. Exporters must file an annual report with EPA summarizing the types, quantities, and destinations of all hazardous waste exported. Records must be retained for at least three years.

Exports to another OECD country instead must meet similar RCRA regulations designed to ensure consistency with OECD requirements. These include incorporation of OECD’s distinction between “Green Wastes” (wastes that present low risk for human health and the environment and, therefore, are not subject to any other controls than those normally applied in commercial transactions) and “Amber Wastes” (wastes presenting sufficient risk to justify their control). These RCRA regulations regulate as hazardous each waste that is a RCRA hazardous waste and/or an Amber waste not otherwise regulated as hazardous, and regulate Green Wastes as non-hazardous. These rules include notifications to EPA and consent by the receiving country similar to those described above, use of a “movement document” analogous to RCRA’s Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest, and requirements for a contract for transportation and management of the wastes. Exported wastes are to be managed in compliance with the receiving country’s requirements for these activities.

Basel Convention Considerations

In addition to OECD’s provisions, 172 nations and the European Union have ratified the 1989 Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal (Basel Convention). OECD revised its Decision in 2001 to align with Basel Convention provisions. President George Bush signed the agreement on behalf of the U.S. in 1989, but the Senate has never ratified it. Absent ratification, the United States cannot participate in waste transfers with Basel Parties without a separate and equivalent bilateral or multilateral agreement. The OECD agreement and NAFTA treaties constitutes such multilateral agreements, and the U.S. also has bilateral agreements with Costa Rica, Malaysia and the Philippines.

Imports of Hazardous Waste

Importers of hazardous wastes must complete manifests for the wastes, substituting their name and facility identifications for the non-domestic generator’s. The importer must provide the transporter with an additional copy to submit to EPA in compliance with the transporter’s manifest requirements. If the import is from an OECD country, the importer must also ensure that the shipment meets OECD requirements.

Implementation Checklist

If your organization is involved in imports and/or exports involving U.S. territory, consider the following checklist. If it is involved in imports or exports involving other OECD countries, the same general issues apply.

Does my organization intend to export hazardous waste, acting as the “primary exporter"?

  • If so, is the shipment being sent to:
    • Canada or Mexico?
    • Another OECD country?
    • A non-OECD country?
  • Has my organization secured formal consent from the receiving country? 
  • Has my organization notified EPA of its intent to export? 
  • Has my organization received EPA’s acknowledgement of the receiving country’s consent? 
  • Does each shipment comply with domestic U.S. manifest requirements, and applicable requirements of the receiving country? 
  • Does the organization retain all required records? 
  • Does my organization intend to import hazardous waste?
  • If so, is the shipment being sent from:
    • Canada or Mexico?
    • Another OECD country?
    • A non-OECD country?
  • Does each shipment comply with domestic U.S. manifest requirements? 
  • Does the organization retain all required records? 

 

Where can I go for more information?

Read More

Tags: International, Health & Safety, Environmental risks, Environmental, EPA, Hazcom